x
x
The American media landscape has undergone profound transformations over the past several decades, with Designated Market Areas (DMAs) serving as the fundamental geographic units through which audiences are measured, content is distributed, and advertising revenue is generated across television, radio, and increasingly digital platforms. This comprehensive examination reveals that the modern DMA ecosystem is characterized by significant consolidation of private media ownership, the decline of public broadcasting infrastructure, the complex regulatory oversight of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and the dramatic technological shifts driven by internet penetration, streaming adoption, and social media proliferation. These intersecting forces have created a media environment in which traditional broadcasting remains relevant but diminished, public media faces unprecedented funding challenges, and digital platforms have emerged as dominant arbiters of content consumption and advertising investment, fundamentally reshaping how Americans across different geographic markets access information, entertainment, and civic discourse.
Designated Market Areas, known as DMAs, represent one of the most significant organizational frameworks in American broadcasting, providing standardized geographic units through which the entire national media system is structured and measured. DMAs are proprietary geographic regions defined and maintained by Nielsen Media Research, establishing non-overlapping boundaries that group counties based on television viewing patterns and broadcast signal reach. The concept emerged in the 1950s when television began to dominate the American media landscape, as marketers and advertisers faced a growing need to understand and define television markets for more targeted advertising purposes. Currently, there are exactly 210 DMA regions in total, covering the entire continental United States, Hawaii, and parts of Alaska, with each DMA representing an area in which local television stations capture a dominant share of viewing.
The significance of DMAs extends far beyond their simple geographic function. These market areas are ranked annually according to the number of television households within each region, with New York City holding the top position as DMA #1 with approximately 7.1 to 7.3 million television homes, while smaller markets like Glendive, Montana rank as DMA #210 with approximately 3,900 people. The combined 210 market areas across the United States reach a total of 120 million television homes, making DMAs the essential infrastructure through which national advertising strategies are executed and regional media consumption is analyzed. The size and ranking of each DMA directly correlates with advertising rates and revenue potential, meaning that larger, higher-ranked markets command significantly higher prices for advertising placements and attract more substantial corporate investment in media infrastructure. DMAs are defined not merely by population but by complex demographic, geographic, and behavioral factors, including signal reach, broadcast content preferences, and over 1,600 demographic data points reflecting regional preferences for news, sports, and entertainment consumption.
The landscape of private media ownership within and across DMAs has undergone dramatic consolidation over the past three decades, fundamentally altering the relationship between broadcasters, advertisers, and audiences at the local market level. Prior to the Telecommunications Act of 1996, strict federal regulations limited the number of broadcast stations any single entity could own in a given market, with clear rules preventing cross-ownership of radio and television properties within the same DMA. However, the Telecommunications Act of 1996, signed into law by President Bill Clinton on February 8, 1996, fundamentally transformed the regulatory landscape by eliminating the national cap on radio station ownership and substantially relaxing restrictions on how many stations a single company could own within individual markets. The stated intention of the legislation was to "let anyone enter any communications business" and to "let any communications business compete in any market against any other," yet in practice, the act precipitated one of the largest consolidations of the telecommunications sector in history. Within five years of the Telecommunications Act's passage, radio station ownership dropped from 5,100 owners to 3,800 owners, and this trend has continued relentlessly to the present day, with corporate behemoth iHeartMedia (formerly Clear Channel) now owning over 800 radio stations across the country.
The effects of media consolidation manifest strikingly within individual DMAs, where audiences increasingly receive programming controlled by a handful of massive media conglomerates rather than from independent or locally-focused broadcasters. As of the present period, 40 percent of all local television news stations in the United States fall under the control of just three broadcast conglomerates: Gray Television, Nexstar Media Group, and Sinclair Broadcast Group, with each company now owning approximately 100 stations affiliated with ABC, CBS, FOX, or NBC operating in more than 80 percent of US media markets. Research analyzing transcripts of local newscasts from 650 stations between 2013 and 2019 found that when Sinclair acquired a station, coverage of local events and local politics declined by approximately 10 percent, while Nexstar expanded local coverage and Gray made minimal changes, demonstrating that the agenda of the new owner directly determines what viewers within a given DMA see and what they do not see. The consolidation has extended throughout the radio industry as well, with major media ownership groups now controlling the vast majority of stations in most markets, resulting in what industry observers call "radio homogenization," in which local programming and content are lost and content is repeated regardless of location.
This concentration of ownership has profound consequences for content diversity within DMAs, particularly regarding local news production and community-focused programming. Before the deregulation that followed the Telecommunications Act of 1996, a mid-size city with perhaps 10 to 20 radio stations might have employed hundreds of people working in programming, production, and on-air talent, with each station maintaining local newsrooms and community-focused content. Following the dramatic consolidation enabled by deregulation, those same cities might now see their stations owned by three or four corporations that stretch resources across multiple stations or pull content directly from corporate offices via satellite, resulting in the loss of the overwhelming majority of local radio jobs and the virtualization of much local programming. The result is that independent voices have become exceedingly rare within many DMAs, with college radio stations increasingly serving as the only non-religious broadcast outlets that originate and are programmed locally, and community radio remaining vital precisely because commercial consolidation has eliminated these traditional sources of local expression. For local television, ownership restrictions theoretically still apply, yet they have become virtually meaningless in many markets, as FCC rules largely prevent TV broadcasters from owning two of the top four-rated broadcast stations in a media market, yet this restriction ignores the vast array of competition from streaming platforms to social media giants.
Public broadcasting in the United States has operated as an alternative to commercial, advertising-supported media since the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 established the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) to promote and help support non-commercial educational television and radio. The CPB was created with a mission to ensure universal access to non-commercial, high-quality educational, cultural, and other content and telecommunications services, receiving annual funding from Congress to distribute to more than 1,500 locally owned and operated public radio and television stations, including PBS and NPR outlets. For nearly six decades, the CPB supported a system that delivered trusted content and vital services to nearly all Americans, with the corporation distributing more than 70 percent of its federal funding directly to public radio and television stations, with the remainder divided between programming investment, system-wide support, and administrative operations. Public media stations have historically used CPB funding to produce local programming, provide community services in news, education, and public safety, purchase broadcast equipment, and acquire national programming, with stations raising approximately six dollars for every federal dollar they received from CPB, resulting in a highly effective public-private partnership.
However, public broadcasting in America faces an unprecedented existential crisis following Congressional action in July 2025 that halted all federal funding to the CPB, representing a seismic shift in the decades-old commitment to universal public media access. When Congress decided to eliminate $1.1 billion allocated to public broadcasting, it left approximately 330 PBS and 246 NPR stations, each with unique issues related to their communities and histories, to figure out how to survive without the funding they had relied upon. The CPB was particularly vital for rural and underserved communities, with a 2007 Government Accountability Office report and 2025 Congressional Research Service report both finding that public broadcasting stations in smaller and rural media markets had substantially greater dependence on federal funding, with CPB grants accounting for at least 25 percent of station revenue for at least half of rural stations and more than 50 percent of revenue for some stations. In Spokane, Washington, KSPS faced a surprise extra hurdle when many of its contributing members, at one point almost half, lived in Canada and withdrew support out of anger at political developments, leaving the station with a $1.2 million hole to fill representing about 18 percent of its budget. Stations across the country launched emergency fund drives following the defunding, and while the national NPR and PBS networks reduced expected dues payments and philanthropic efforts focused on the hardest-hit stations took shape, no stations had shut down as of late 2025, though job and programming cuts already began.
The crisis forced public media stations to implement difficult immediate decisions regarding staffing and programming. In Spokane, for example, 12 of KSPS's 35 staff members were either laid off, had their hours reduced, or experienced pay cuts, and the station also considered that future seasons of local shows would have fewer episodes. At PBS, leadership anticipated making shorter seasons of series going forward, even as several upcoming shows were completed. The broader concern extends to the sustainability of the entire public media ecosystem, with PBS President Paula Kerger stating that "I am a realist" and expressing belief "that there are some vulnerable stations that are not going to make it," while acknowledging that the bigger reckoning may come a year or more later when emergency donations and "rainy day" resources are depleted. The defunding crisis has forced public media stations to work together in new ways, with stations searching for ways to share services including finances, management, and programming, and some public stations meeting to explore state financing alternatives. For rural and remote DMAs where public media represents the only source of local news and educational programming, the loss of federal funding threatens to create devastating information gaps affecting millions of Americans who depend on these stations for emergency alerts, educational resources, and news coverage.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) stands as the principal federal regulatory body governing communications by radio, television, wire, internet, Wi-Fi, satellite, and cable across the United States, maintaining jurisdiction over the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and American territories, with its mandate extending to areas including broadband access, fair competition, radio frequency use, media responsibility, public safety, and homeland security. The FCC was established pursuant to the Communications Act of 1934 to replace the radio regulation functions of the previous Federal Radio Commission and took over wire communication regulation from the Interstate Commerce Commission. The FCC's foundational mandate, as specified in Section 1 of the Communications Act of 1934 and amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, is to make available so far as possible to all people of the United States, without discrimination based on race, color, religion, national origin, or sex, rapid, efficient nationwide and worldwide wire and radio communication services with adequate facilities at reasonable charges. The FCC is funded entirely by regulatory fees, with an estimated fiscal-2022 budget of $388 million and 1,433 federal personnel as of 2022, making it one of the smallest federal agencies responsible for regulating one of the largest sectors of the American economy.
A pivotal moment in FCC regulation came with the repeal of the Fairness Doctrine in 1987, fundamentally transforming the broadcast regulatory landscape and opening the door to the polarized media environment that has characterized American broadcasting for the subsequent four decades. The Fairness Doctrine, rooted in the media world of 1949 when lawmakers became concerned that the monopoly audience control of NBC, ABC, and CBS could misuse their broadcast licenses to set a biased public agenda, mandated that broadcast networks devote time to contrasting views on issues of public importance. Congress backed the policy in 1954, and by the 1970s the FCC called it the "single most important requirement of operation in the public interest," with the Supreme Court upholding the doctrine in 1969's Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, which found that nothing in the First Amendment gives a broadcast license holder the exclusive right to the airwaves they operate on. However, under FCC Chairman Mark S. Fowler (a communications attorney who served on Ronald Reagan's presidential campaign staff), the FCC began rolling back the doctrine's application during Reagan's second term, and in 1987 the FCC panel under new chairman Dennis Patrick repealed the Fairness Doctrine altogether with a 4-0 vote despite opposition from Congress. The repeal of the Fairness Doctrine enabled the rise of conservative-dominated talk radio with vast political consequences, as without the doctrine's requirements for balance, radio stations could operate with minimal regulatory constraints on editorial viewpoint.
The FCC's approach to media ownership regulation has evolved dramatically from its early protective stance toward localism to its current more permissive approach, reflecting broader ideological and economic shifts in American regulatory philosophy. Historically, the FCC maintained strict limitations on station ownership to preserve localism and prevent monopolistic control of information within individual markets, enforcing duopoly rules that limited how many stations a company could own within a single DMA and cross-ownership restrictions preventing common ownership of television and radio properties. However, beginning in the 1980s and accelerating with the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC began systematically dismantling ownership restrictions, enabling the consolidation that has characterized the subsequent era. More recently, FCC leadership has faced pressure from multiple directions regarding spectrum policy, with the FCC losing its auction authority on March 9, 2023, a loss that has prevented the agency from conducting any auctions for new broadcast stations and has constrained its ability to manage the valuable radio spectrum. Some political figures have proposed using spectrum auctions as a means of reallocating broadcast licenses, with tech entrepreneur Elon Musk using his X platform to advocate for forcing television stations off the airwaves by auctioning off their federally licensed spectrum, claiming that "legacy broadcast networks are using public spectrum, but act as an extension of the Democratic Party," though such proposals remain politically contentious.
The American media landscape has undergone a revolutionary transformation driven by internet penetration, which reached 93.1 percent of the total population at the start of 2025, meaning that 322 million individuals in the United States use the internet regularly, with internet adoption rates remaining virtually unchanged from the prior year despite continued growth in absolute numbers. This near-universal internet access has fundamentally reshaped how Americans consume media across all age groups, with social media platforms emerging as extraordinarily powerful forces that rival and increasingly exceed traditional broadcast and cable television in their capacity to capture audience attention and advertising dollars. As of January 2025, 246 million Americans use social media, representing 72.5 percent of the total population, with this number growing by 7 million users between January 2024 and January 2025, representing a 2.93 percent year-over-year increase. YouTube remains by far the most widely used social media platform in America, with 83 percent of U.S. adults and 239 million active users engaging with the platform, with the platform capturing 93 percent of adults aged 18 to 29 and users spending an average of 26.21 hours per month on the YouTube mobile app.
Beyond YouTube, Facebook maintains dominance as a platform through which Americans access news and connect with others, with 68 percent of U.S. adults using the platform and 38 percent of U.S. adults saying they regularly get news on Facebook. Instagram reaches approximately 47 percent of U.S. adults, with 20 percent regularly getting news from the platform, while TikTok has experienced extraordinary growth, with 33 percent of U.S. adults using the platform as of 2025, up 12 percentage points from 2021, and 55 percent of TikTok users reporting they regularly get news on the platform, up from just 22 percent in 2020. Overall, about half of U.S. adults (53 percent) say they at least sometimes get news from social media, with this figure remaining relatively stable over recent years. The demographic patterns of social media usage reveal stark age-related divides, with adults under 30 far more likely than older counterparts to use multiple platforms, with approximately three-quarters of adults under 30 using at least five of the major platforms compared to just 8 percent of those aged 65 and older. Women are notably more likely than men to regularly get news from Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok, while men show greater affinity for YouTube, X (formerly Twitter), and Reddit. Democrats are also more likely than Republicans to get news from Instagram, TikTok, and Reddit, though roughly equal shares of each party say they regularly get news from YouTube.
The American media landscape has experienced a historic and accelerating shift in viewing patterns away from traditional broadcast and cable television toward streaming services, with streaming reaching a milestone in May 2025 when its share of total television usage outpaced the combined share of broadcast and cable for the first time ever. Streaming represented 44.8 percent of TV viewership in May 2025, its largest share of viewing to date, while broadcast and cable combined represented only 44.2 percent of television usage. When comparing television usage in May 2021 and May 2025, a four-year period that encompasses the dramatic transformation of American media consumption, streaming increased by 71 percent, while broadcast and cable viewing declined by 21 and 39 percent respectively, demonstrating the striking speed of this technological and behavioral shift. YouTube emerged as the dominant force within streaming, with YouTube Main (excluding YouTube TV) showing a 120 percent increase since 2021, representing 12.5 percent of all television viewing in May 2025, marking its fourth consecutive monthly share increase and the highest share of TV for any streamer to date. Free services have been a major driver of streaming's overall success, with Free Ad-Supported Television (FAST) services including PlutoTV, Roku Channel, and Tubi combining for 5.7 percent of total TV viewing in May, which is larger than any individual broadcast network.
The phenomenon known as cord-cutting, wherein households cancel traditional pay-TV subscriptions and replace them with alternatives including over-the-air broadcast television, streaming services, or a combination thereof, has emerged as a fundamental and accelerating trend in American media consumption. In 2024 alone, 4.9 million people cut the cord, bringing the total number of cord-cutters to 39.3 million, representing an 18.9 percent increase year over year. Projections suggest that by 2030, fewer than 6 in 10 U.S. households will have cable subscriptions, representing a dramatic decline from the current adoption rate of approximately 81 percent of households. Cord-cutting has been driven overwhelmingly by price considerations, with the average cable bill reaching approximately $107 per month and 86.7 percent of cord-cutters identifying price as their primary motivation for abandoning cable. Additionally, only 34 percent of cable subscribers report feeling they receive good value from their subscriptions, with many paying for large channel bundles they do not watch, and the price-to-value ratio driving frustration and subscriber defection.
The streaming market has consolidated around a relatively small number of dominant platforms, with Amazon Prime Video leading the U.S. market with a 22 percent share of streaming subscriptions as of 2025, while Netflix follows closely with a 21 percent share, though Netflix maintains dominance in other English-speaking markets including Canada (24 percent) and the United Kingdom (27 percent). Max holds the second and third most popular positions among American viewers with significant user bases, while Disney+, Hulu, Paramount+, and Apple TV+ maintain substantial market shares. The shift toward streaming has profound implications for traditional broadcasters, cable operators, and local media markets, as advertising dollars that once flowed to local broadcast stations increasingly migrate to national streaming platforms and social media companies that can offer sophisticated targeting, measurement, and optimization capabilities that local markets cannot match. This shift has been particularly consequential for local news production, as streaming services and social platforms offer primarily national content rather than local programming, leaving local news increasingly dependent on the diminishing number of traditional broadcast stations and their corporate owners.
The history of American broadcasting extends back to the earliest years of radio development in the 1920s and 1930s, with the medium emerging initially as an experimental technology operated by hobbyists before quickly being recognized as a powerful medium for transmitting information and entertainment to mass audiences. Broadcasting in the United States began with experiments with wireless transmission during the nineteenth century, with varying degrees of success, as many individuals continued to experiment with their own methods of broadcasting. By the 1920s, the first commercial radio broadcasts began, with the concept of selling advertising time emerging as the primary business model for broadcasting when AT&T created the concept of "toll broadcasting" that allowed anyone to use a licensed radio station to broadcast messages in exchange for fees. The first such "radio toll station" was WBAY (later consolidated with WEAF) in New York City, which went into operation on July 25, 1922, establishing the foundation for advertising-supported broadcasting that would dominate American radio and television for the subsequent century.
The transition from radio to television broadcasting represented the next major historical transformation, with television beginning with experiments in the 1920s and 1930s and emerging as a commercial medium in the late 1940s. The period from 1947 to 1960 became known as the "Golden Age of Television," characterized by its large number of live productions and innovative programming concepts, followed by the "Network Era" from the late 1950s through the mid-1980s, during which the "Big Three" networks of NBC, CBS, and ABC dominated American television. During the network era, the Big Three television networks captured the vast majority of American television viewing, with the period characterized by limited viewer choice and extremely limited technology, as television stations were largely limited to line-of-sight transmission from the transmitter, with the wide bandwidth heavily limiting the choices available in any given geographic area. The network era represented the apex of centralized media control in America, with three corporations effectively determining what tens of millions of Americans watched each evening, fundamentally shaping national culture, politics, and civic discourse.
The development of cable television initiated the beginning of the end of network dominance, with cable television originating in the United States in 1948 almost simultaneously in Arkansas, Oregon, and Pennsylvania to enhance poor reception of over-the-air television signals in mountainous or geographically remote areas. "Community antennas" were erected on mountain tops or other high points, and homes were connected to the antenna towers to receive broadcast signals through hard wires, establishing what became known as Community Antenna Television (CATV). By 1952, seventy cable systems served 14,000 subscribers nationwide, and by 1962, almost 800 cable systems serving 850,000 subscribers were in operation, with well-known corporate names like Westinghouse, TelePrompTer, and Cox beginning to invest in the business. The 1984 Cable Act established a more favorable regulatory framework for the cable industry, stimulating investment on an unprecedented level, with the industry spending more than $15 billion between 1984 and 1992 on wiring America and program development, representing the largest private construction project since World War II.
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 represented the most transformative piece of regulatory legislation affecting American broadcasting since the Communications Act of 1934, as the act eliminated caps on radio station ownership and substantially relaxed restrictions on television ownership, fundamentally enabling the consolidation that has characterized the era since 1996. Within five years of the act's passage, the number of radio station owners dropped from 5,100 to 3,800, and this consolidation trend has continued relentlessly to the present day, with the vast majority of radio stations now controlled by a small number of large media companies. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 has been praised for incentivizing the expansion of networks and the offering of new services across the United States, yet it is often criticized for enabling market concentration in the media and telecommunications industries, going against its very stated intention by indirectly restricting newcomer access to broadcasting. Historian Howard Zinn identified the act as a significant factor in the loss of alternative and community media, writing in the 2003 edition of "A People's History of the United States" that "the Telecommunications Act of 1996…enabled the handful of corporations dominating the airwaves to expand their power further. Mergers enabled tighter control of information".
The contemporary American media landscape confronts profound challenges regarding the availability of local news, the sustainability of journalism as a profession, and the civic consequences of media consolidation and the transformation of media consumption patterns. On average, 2.5 newspapers are shutting down each week in the United States, and the number of local journalists has declined sharply even as the U.S. population has grown, creating what researchers describe as "a nationwide shortage of local journalists that's more widespread and severe than previously understood". The collapse of local news threatens the civic health of America's cities and towns, as research demonstrates that the loss of local news contributes to polarization, decreased voting participation, and diminished government accountability. Local news serves as an essential lever for a healthy democracy, helping communities understand what is at stake in local elections, equipping them to get involved in the political process through voting and contacting officials, reducing political polarization, and holding public officials accountable.
The crisis in local journalism particularly affects smaller and rural DMAs, where the loss of local news coverage has created information deserts in which audiences lack reliable sources of information about local government, schools, public safety, and other institutions that directly affect their daily lives. Some people live at the intersection of two or more DMAs, meaning they receive broadcast signals from multiple markets, yet this situation may result in their own town or county being at the periphery of coverage from either market's stations, leaving them with minimal local news coverage. The vacuums left by the contraction of local news are being filled by social media, talk radio, national cable television news, and what researchers call "pink slime"—shady websites pretending to be objective but actually backed by political dark money from the left and right. There exists a race against time to strengthen local news before such unreliable information sources erode all trust in local news, with the challenge becoming one of replacing bad information with sound, fair-minded local reporting on matters of local importance.
The media landscape of American Designated Market Areas stands at a critical juncture, characterized by the simultaneous decline of traditional broadcasting institutions, the consolidation of private media ownership into an ever-smaller number of corporate hands, the near-total defunding of public broadcasting, and the rapid migration of audience attention and advertising dollars to digital and social media platforms that operate at scales transcending traditional geographic markets. The 210 DMAs that have served as the organizing framework for American broadcasting since the 1950s remain relevant as geographic units for understanding regional media consumption and advertising, yet their utility has been fundamentally undermined by the technological convergence that enables consumers to access content from anywhere in the world through internet-connected devices, social media algorithms, and streaming services that prioritize engagement over geography. The public-private balance that once characterized American broadcasting has shifted overwhelmingly toward privatization and commercialism, with the elimination of CPB federal funding in 2025 representing a symbolic and practical end to the decades-long commitment to universal access to educational and informational content.
As American media continues to evolve through technological change and market forces, the future of local media within DMAs remains uncertain, contingent upon whether policymakers, philanthropists, and communities will invest in new sustainable models for local journalism and whether technology platforms will develop greater accountability for the information environments they create. The transformation of the media landscape has created both unprecedented opportunities for diverse voices and technologies for content creation and distribution, and profound challenges for journalism, democracy, and informed civic participation. The tension between the national scale of modern media corporations and the local scale of communities represents one of the defining challenges of contemporary American media policy, with the question of whether information-hungry Americans in smaller markets will have access to reliable, locally-focused reporting increasingly dependent upon philanthropic support, nonprofit models, government policy, and technological innovation rather than the commercial market forces that once sustained local broadcasting. The next several years will likely prove determining for whether local media survives as a meaningful force in American communities or whether it continues its decline into near-irrelevance, replaced entirely by national and global digital platforms that optimize for engagement and profit rather than for the civic functions that local news has traditionally served.
